They are idiots and don't realize that the entire series of games hook together. Fools. I shall bury them in my ..er..mighty wrath..y..thing. Stupid Toonami.
easily, a 9 or 10... Toonami sucks, they probably already have an opinion about the game because they show the show on adult swim... and you know Toonami, they're all about action cartoons... and because hack//sign doesn't have any action( ) they don't like it... or maybe I'm just too tired to be posting...
Only in dreams; We see what it means
Reach out our hands; Hold on to hers
But when we wake; It's all been erased
And so it seems; Only in dreams
IMO, it really depends on the scale they're using. I've noticed a regrettable tendency for many people to give any work without obvious flaws a 9 or a 10 (out of 10). For a largely enjoyable and recommended work with some minor flaws (as are present in any game), I think a 7 is reasonable, though not generous.
I have to admit that I haven't actually played the games yet, as I don't own a PS2. ^_^; While everything I've seen and heard about the games is good, I wouldn't say they're up to "masterpiece" (e.g. 10) standards.
I don't have a ps2 either... I've only played the game once, until the first time I saw Elk.... I was so overjoyed... *prances off into bubbley happy world, luffing Elk*
I must admit.. the hands look weird. I love what I saw though. I'd give it an 8...
C'mon people. Toonami gave it a 7? Who cares? Think about how much of Toonami's programming is from Bandai. The same Bandai that made the .hack games. I think this just proves that they can be un-biased when rating games.
invisble egg is posting after everything i post!!!!!!! * hides in the other horrible little clooset to stay away from evil stalker posts*( partly kiddin')(just not about the closet)